Advertisements

So this is inevitably where we wind up

All this accommodating of crazy has brought us here. We have people who identify as everything from mops to toasters. We’ve read about douche freaks who identify as children of the opposite sex, or live their lives as animals. There’s a transgender guy who identifies as an alien, and a derelict who identifies as a “Billy Goat” arrested for not paying his bar tab. A couple of years ago, there was a crazed Russian who married a pizza, claiming human relationships were just way too complicated, and another douche taco who married a snake, because he thought his dead girlfriend came back as a cobra. (Now, I love pizza as much as the next person, but I’m not sure how legal it is to eat your spouse. Also, there’s an evil misanthropic part of me that wants to see the guy try to consummate his relationship with his cobra bride.)

Through all this we were supposed to support the delusions of these ass weasels. We were supposed to entertain their lunacy by acknowledging their grotesque fetishes and honor their absurdities by using the preferred pronouns they completely pulled out of their fourth points of contact so they can feelz normal!

Welp, here’s the next link in the dumbass evolutionary chain. Woman marries train station.

Now, there’s someone missing a candle on their menorah! They apparently have sex too. Mentally. Perhaps what this nut really needs is some actual human sex, which she claims she’s had before. Once. Some psychological help probably wouldn’t hurt either.

She choo-choo-chose a train station to be her life partner. Carol Santa Fe, a self-identified objectum sexual, says she’s been in love with San Diego’s historic Santa Fe train depot since the age of 9. “We first consummated our love a few years ago when I felt the wall behind me, and I felt this energy,” she says, claiming she and “Daidra” have been romantic since 2011. “I came close to an orgasm and I was scared I’d get caught by the station staff.” Carol joins the list of people attracted to famous structures, including Erika Eiffel and Eklöf Berliner-Mauer, who “married” the Berlin Wall in 1979.

In case you didn’t know and wanted to, an “objectum sexual” is a person who is sexually attracted to inanimate objects and structures, and this fruitcake claims it’s just like being bisexual or gay! “We’re not crazy,” she claims.

I beg to differ.

Nutbag here hasn’t gotten consent from the building. She is imagining the building loves her and kisses her back. She claims the building is “romantic.” Hell, she is claiming the building almost brought her to orgasm! How long before someone notices this freak show humping a wall?

She claims she’s all on the down low, because she doesn’t want anyone to notice her ministrations, but yet, here she is publicly proclaiming her “affair” with a train depot on video that’s been pretty widely disseminated and in every medium she could find!

Now, granted, I’m a live and let live kind of person. She’s not harming anyone, and she’s ridiculously happy. So be it. Now, if she does get naked and starts humping that wall in full view of the public, that’s another story. Ain’t nobody need to see that shit! But for now, let the crazy be.

That said, I’m certainly not going to entertain her wacky delusions by acknowledging her “union,” or pretending that this is some kind of normal.

It’s not.

If you want to be a freak, you need to own that shit.

Advertisements

58 responses

  1. BillyBob Texas | Reply

    Whadaya expect for these wacko’s…?

    Like

    1. I expect them to vote Democrat.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I think that it is only fair for this woman to have to prove that the train station is not already in a committed relationship, before saying that she wants to get married to it. Unless the train station is in Utah, where the laws are a little bit shaky about that sort of thing.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I remember when somebody in Colorado wanted to marry his horse (actually as a “taking the p*ss” protest) and the clerk said that because the horse was below the age of consent, it’d have to get consent in writing from its parents.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. roy in nipomo | Reply

        It probably was wanted in writing because the clerk knew they’d say neigh to te marriage.

        Liked by 1 person

    2. And she needs consent. Otherwise it’s mental rape.

      Like

    3. If you are willing to allow marriage to inanimate objects, the polyandry ship has already sailed.

      Like

  3. Look, you have people who just need to be speshul. So the more accommodating you become, the more outré the perversions or identities they have to invent to get their narcissistic supply.

    Liked by 3 people

  4. Sigh. To quote the great and late muse, Frank Zappa (IIRC): “When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.”

    Liked by 3 people

    1. I thought that was Hunter Thompson.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. It was his 300-lb Samoan attorney. Cultural appropriation, stealing it from the brother!!!!eleventy!!!

        Like

  5. Yeah these specific weirdos have likely always existed we just never heard about them…

    Like

    1. Thanks, Internet!

      Like

  6. Hmmm, maybe I should claim I married the earth. OK everybody, get off my spouse, you’re hurting her.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Now I wonder what the social justice howler monkeys would say to THAT!!

      Liked by 1 person

    2. You’d better make haste. Most of the Earth is already taken:
      https://tempestinateardrop.com/2016/05/31/married-to-the-sea/

      Just sayin’

      Like

  7. On the scale of weird this lady barely gets noticed. Hoards of women marry the same invisible dead Jew all the time and everyone thinks they are great. I am not sure how they consummate the relationship but at least this woman can put her hands on what she loves and does not have to run around dressed like a penguin.

    Some people are married to their work, not me of course, but some people are. At least they get something out of it that is tangible.

    From my marriage I get mostly strange looks, gestures of disgust and the occasional wince of ‘why are you here’. Marriage is not all it is drummed up to be. I can’t even get a sandwich around here.

    The days when a woman knew her place and took pride in it are all gone.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. She stopped beating you? Dammit! I need to have a conversation with her.

      Liked by 2 people

  8. I miss the days when we had a place for people like this to live with like minded folk. They were called insane asylums.

    Like

    1. 11B-Mailclerk | Reply

      Now we call that place “Washington DC”.

      Like

    2. well…i am really always a fan of locking fewer people up if possible. As a general rule of thumb. Besides, there would be far fewer people to make fun of.

      Like

    3. I agree. I often bemoan the closing of the asylums. Life would be a lot less frustrating, we’d have far fewer homeless, they would be fed, clothed, and sheltered, they would get the help they so desperately need, and crime rates would go down.

      Liked by 1 person

  9. *shakes head* And yet, these are the people who look down on men who prefer Real Dolls. And I forsee ‘imagined consent’ going to be used by some female rapist at some point.

    Makes me happy that I have this nice, quiet life, in my corner of the world, where I don’t need to make myself an embarrassment to the rest of the planet, in order to affirm “I exist and it’s not meaningless.” I don’t need to make up problems for my life to ‘be interesting’ I have enough real ones to be annoying.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. I identify as a Peter Thiel. I think the federal government should fund my transitioning.

    Like

  11. I am going to marry the Oxford Comma and insist that anyone else who uses her be prosecuted for adultery.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. *gasps!* Misha! How could you! Assuming the gender of the Oxford Comma without getting the straight answer from the …

      Ach, just trying to construct the sentence while trying to pretend snowflakery illogic patterns of speech failed me there. I can’t. ~_~;

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Patrick Chester | Reply

        Yes, trying to think like that can be painful for the brain. 😮

        Liked by 1 person

  12. If it’s illegal to eat your spouse…no, on second thought, I’m not going there.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Felines and things named Richard may very well be exempted.

      Like

    2. *eyes praying mantises and spiders* Some of those ‘but it’s natural, so it must be good!’ people might use their default idiotic argument to justify that…

      Liked by 2 people

  13. You can only say “What the fuck? What the fucking fuck?” so many times before it loses its impact.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. I keep praying we get intergalactic space travel in my life time. If it happens i’m going the way of the good Captain Reynolds.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. She consummated her love with a wall?

    Is that why there’s an ad for wood screws on this page?

    Liked by 1 person

      1. pulling a train?

        Like

  16. [Directed at no one in particular, just a broad survey:]

    Ya know… as much as I hate to say it, some of us said that nationalizing homosexual “marriage” would lead to this extent of insanity. And you laughed at us, you laughed at our “slippery slope” argument.

    Next is the “normalization” of incest. Hollywood is on it:

    http://www.thewrap.com/toronto-film-fest-nick-cassevetes-incest-who-gives-damn-love-who-you-want-55581/

    Once that’s accomplished (and it won’t be long), they’ll be coming for our kids.

    Go ahead and laugh at that. I’ll see you in a few years. The sexualization of children is long in progress; even the Disney Channel is on it. Little girls in “booty” shorts, really? With suggestive slogans on the back, really? Nooooo, our children aren’t being sexualized!

    Keep laughing.

    We warned you, and your libertarian live-and-let-live philosophy has brought this all upon us. We said there would be social and legal repercussions no one could imagine. By and by, it is all coming to fruition.

    You may think it’s perfectly okay for a priest to go to gaol for refusing to officiate a homosexual “marriage”, but when it hits home, you’ll be begging us for space in our overcrowded catacombs.

    Like

    1. There’s a big difference between consenting adults normalizing their relationships and what you’re describing. Sorry no. Disingenuous comparisons.

      Like

      1. BillyBob Texas | Reply

        No, Nikki, I do not believe it is a big jump from LBGQTXYZ relationships to dogs, horses or in the case of some of our mideast friends, goats and sheep. Who are YOU to say they cannot marry their horse? What gives YOU the right to say I cannot love my brother, mother, child, or goat? Because we are only allowed to marry a homo sapiens? Why? Who are YOU to say that? I could love my dog more than my ex-wife or my kids – or my stepkids – or my cousin, etc., etc.,

        WHO are YOU to say? It’s MY love and devotion – and I can give it to whomever (or whatever) I chose – NOT YOU.

        So….answer me that, Batman.

        Like

        1. You are wrong. It’s about consent. Let’s not go down the road of comparing living, thinking, consenting adults to animals and inanimate objects.

          Like

    2. I was going to make a few snide comments, but it’s really impossible to take people who believe that the world was populated (twice!) by an incestuous family seriously.

      And let’s not even get started on Kentucky, where incest is practically mandatory.

      Liked by 1 person

  17. Of course its legal to eat your spouse!

    Like

  18. After a complete lack of words for 30 solid minutes, having read the article twice, watching the pink thing do what amounts to verbal fecality, and daring to peruse the linked articles and videos… yes, indeed, that’s where we’re headin’.

    I have come to think of gender as this: You have a penis, great, you are a man. You have a vagina, fantastic, you are a woman. I think you’re a little touched in the head if you want to switch, but for fuck’s sake, go ahead… you get *one* choice here – it’s all or nothing, you can’t go halfsies.
    If you are Intersex (you have both, nothing, penigina), we can have a long discussion – but have a doctor’s note handy in case you get scared looks in public bathrooms.

    The rest is dress-up and make-belief… or what we grown-ups correctly term as “going through a phase”. You are a human, not another animal, plant or oh-what-the-fuck-now.

    Sexual preference: Between two (or more) consenting adults of the human species, all is fine. The whole statement has to apply or you are in severe need for help and/or judgement – nonnegotiable.

    Clarification: I am big-time into men, but the LGBWTF* revoked my gay-card for calling them fags… and I was so close to get that toaster-oven!
    Reading your article(s) should be mandatory in High Screwl… a warning to educate, like they have in Driver’s Ed.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. I think I love you! In a totally platonic, non sexual type of way. 😉

      Like

  19. So in 1979 Erika Eiffel cheated on her famous husband with the Berlin Wall! Shame on her. But we all know how girls are attracted to those bad, bad structures.

    Like

    1. Is this an inappropriate time to point out that “erection” used to mean any large structure?

      Like

  20. Ridicule is a necessary tool of civilization.

    Like

  21. Been a cop for over 22 years, always have to tell people,”it’s not against the law to be crazy” as long as no threat to yourself or others…have at it

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Agreed. Just don’t expect the rest of us to validate said crazy! Own that shit!

      Like

  22. Sounds to me like she raped that poor defenseless building. Is the Left now saying rape is okay?

    Like

    1. Well, you know… she claims the train station consented, and who are we to question crazy?

      Like

      1. BillyBob Texas | Reply

        Yep! As I asked earlier……once we have broken the mold on being able to marry same sex human beings…..the ‘mold’ is broken. Not cracked, not chipped, BROKEN. We already see wackos marrying inanimate objects…Wackos. But HEY! how about living objects….like your child, cousin, mother, or animal of choice……

        There’s no going back. So don’t be surprised of what’s ahead…..since you threw out 5,000 years of homo sapiens civilization…..”for just this one little thing”……

        Like

        1. Comparing a consenting adult human being to a wall or animal is ridiculous.

          Like

      2. Someone, during an Atlas Shrugged reading group, tried to claim that the whole scene with the Tunnel collapse was sexual imagery, and the moderator said, sometimes a train is just a train…

        Like

  23. BillyBob Texas | Reply

    Nikki – you keep going back to “consenting adult human beings”……who the hell are you to tell me my sister and I cannot get married? Or my mother? And what IS the age of consent? In what state or what State…..as obviously in some States you can marry a frickin’ 9 yr old – and then come to THIS country….and who the hell are you to tell them they cannot be married?

    Where do YOU draw the line…on consenting ages and familial situations? Who made YOU God on these things? I may love my little friend or my little sister more than life itself – and YOU are trying to stop ME from our happiness. Who said YOU get to make these decisions?

    Same shit we’ve heard about the same-sex…….how can your rules justify THEIRS, but not MINE?

    This shit is coming………..and will be allowed by some court……thanks to the LGBTQXYZ people getting ‘their way’ with the laws….

    The mold is broken.

    Like

    1. Hey, if you want to marry your sister or your mother, you should be free to do so, as long as I don’t have to pay my tax dollars to care for your three-headed kids. All on you.

      The age of consent is a thorny subject. Currently you’re considered an adult at 18. Some 18-year olds are more mature than others. But generally speaking if you’re a legal adult, you can marry. You fuck a kid and you get sodomized with a cricket bat. Period.

      Liked by 2 people

We Want To Hear What You Have To Say

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: