Harf Should Really Just Shut Her Yap

In case you haven’t heard, there’s more stupidity coming out of the State Department in the form of something resembling words (and ostensibly logic, however bad) from the gaping maw of State Department spokeshole Marie Harf.

See, apparently we can just make terrorists not be terrorists anymore if we just offer them some jobs… maybe a $15/hour living wage… something. But we certainly can’t kill them all!

My reply to this would be, “Why not at least try?” But that might be too “nuanced” for some (and by “nuanced,” I mean, “politically incorrect.”)

And when anyone with a shred of common sense became publicly appalled at the vast amount of stupid, Harf decided to dig a little deeper by claiming her words were just way too “nuanced” for us conservative dolts.

“We cannot kill every terrorist around the world, nor should we try,” Harf said later. “How do you get at the root causes of this? It might be too nuanced an argument for some, like I’ve seen over the last 24 hours some of the commentary out there, but it’s really the smart way that Democrats, Republicans, our partners in the Arab world think we need to combat it.”

And by “nuanced,” we mean “stupid.” My mind certainly cannot process this much dumbassery in such a short period of time.

When I did my Master’s work in National Security Studies, I actually took a class called “The Roots of Terrorism” taught by an expert in the field – Paul Medhurst.  The work was interesting, in that it examined all aspects of international terrorism and allowed us to draw our own conclusions about its roots.

My conclusion was similar to this report.

While the report says that Western foreign policy and the perception that ‘Islam is under siege’ plays a role, they are not the main cause.

Instead, the four causes of radicalisation are: 

  • ‘Trauma’, such as the death of a loved one: Ten per cent of terror suspects became radicalised after a life trauma, says the report.

  • ‘Migration’: A third of all extremists ‘migrated to Britain alone’.

  •  ‘Criminal activity’: Two-thirds of the sample had criminal records.

  • ‘Prison’: Muslim prisoners who are not religious are often radicalised in prison. The report identified 60 known Islamist extremists operating in British jails.

The report also found that two-thirds of terrorists actually came from middle- to upper-class families, showing there’s no direct correlation between poverty, joblessness, and terrorism.

They’re also not really lone wolves, for the most part, and the vast majority were described as social and having lots of friends.

It’s not poverty and unemployment that prompt terrorists to attack their enemies. It’s ideology. And I would submit that no matter how many jobs you throw at them, that is not going to be fixed by giving them free shit.

Geeze, no wonder Harf went from a Middle East leadership analyst at the Agency to a spokeshole! Saying something stupid, and then condemning critics for not having a strong enough intellect to “get” her nuance doesn’t display too much analytic prowess!

FFS, Marie! Just shut your cock holster and stop embarrassing yourself and the administration!


8 responses

  1. “I just couldn’t get a job beheading folks in the free market…”


  2. Sing it Nicki! I am not smart enough to understand nuance. Thus, I have to believe that the government can, and should, find good jobs with living wages for these people. Maybe we could send over Sen. Feinstein, Schumer, Boxer, and Frankenstein to do for them what they’ve done for us. Anyone can have good paying jobs, free healthcare, community college, low fat food and gun control, if they just wish hard enough. Because it’s fair.


  3. Outstanding. I may not understand the “nuance” of her comments, but I know when someone is telling I’m too stupid to understand what they are saying.
    I also know when their comment is so stupid it could only come from a politician.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Sean D Sorrentino

    What effect does overall economic health of a society have on the ordinary citizen’s willingness to put up with radicalized assholes murdering people?


  5. I actually agree with her original statement…we need to go after the underlying cause of terrorism. She just got that underlying cause wrong…the cause is……..Islam. Period. Full Stop. I don’t want to hear about the “1 Billion peaceful Muslims” until they are the loudest voice on the planet shouting about how their religion is being hijacked.


  6. “We cannot kill every terrorist around the world, nor should we try,” Harf said later.

    We didn’t kill all of the Japanese, yet they surrendered. We didn’t kill all of the Germans and yet they surrendered. Maybe if we dropped a couple of small nukes on their camps they would surrender too. Of course that would take something this country doesn’t have, a real leader. Instead we get these liberal idiot pisswits telling us we need to find them jobs. I wasn’t aware that we had a shortage of 7/11 clerks and taxi drivers.


  7. Does the State Department have a Customer Relations division? As a customer of this government, I feel very unsatisfied with the quality of service the government is providing to us.

    She should have said that “we can’t kill those terrorists because we need them as the military for the Middle East Free Trade Area (MEFTA).”

    And below the radar, the terrorists are needed to generate clients for the refugee resettlement business in the United States. They are also needed to generate the requirement for modernization of the infrastructure in the Middle East.

    So that’s the nuance ya’ll are too dumb to get. Terrorists are good for business.


  8. Surely if we just put all the undocumented terrorists on welfare they will become peace loving…just like in France…or Ferguson!

    Liked by 1 person

%d bloggers like this: