Small Arms Survey: Biased Reporting, Anti-Freedom Goals

Have you ever heard of the Small Arms Survey? They claim to be impartial and objective when providing firearms-related data to governments. My JPFO alert shows they’re neither impartial, nor objective.

via Small Arms Survey: Biased Reporting, Anti-Freedom Goals.

6 responses

  1. Reminds me of those those ridiculous WHO reports which claim countries like Cuba and Venezuela and China have far superior medical systems to the US. When reporting infant mortality data, many countries don’t count premature babies that die as live births. Lies, damn lies, and statistics.

    Like

  2. Actually some of the countries don’t count live births until the child is X-months old.

    To me the graph provided by Dr Lott? Looks just like the “climate change” hockey stick. The problem as we all know it is the LIV can’t think past their next EBT card. I’d like to take the morons that put this out and drop them in East Oakland Kalifornia at 0200 on a Friday night. No guards, no guns and no knives. We can pin a note to them that says

    Return the body to _____________.

    Like

  3. So much for complete thoughts. The LIV above refers to democrats who will hear this on the MSM and swallow it whole without gagging, believing it to be true because the “News” is reporting it.

    Like

  4. You’re just now getting around to noticing these turds?They’ve been putting out crap since the late ’90’s.

    Like

    1. Nope. Just writing about it now, given John Lott’s latest research.

      Like

  5. They were part of a swarm of UN NGO’s that were formed between 1996-2001 specifically to push a civilian gun ban agenda.They got bitch slapped by the Bush II Administration’s John Bolton in 2001 & 2006, along w/a lot of other one’s like Disarme & Iansa, but keep pushing their agenda.

    Like

%d bloggers like this: