Have you ever gotten into a Facebook argument with someone about politics?
Have you ever seen the argument degenerate into something less than savory, where the F-bomb and the C-bomb and other inventive invective gets tossed about liberally?
It happens all the time, people, so if you haven’t had the experience, and you’re passionate about politics, you will probably see this sooner or later.
A friend’s girlfriend got into a pissing contest with some redneck trash that claims it’s a conservative. She happens to be a liberal, but hey… that’s pretty much irrelevant here. The redneck trash in question inserted itself into a conversation about Obama’s vacation spending with which it had nothing to do, and proceeded to flame the girlfriend. This caused her boyfriend (a friend of mine and Rob’s) to get involved.
Now, remember – Scott Schoemann had nothing to do with this conversation initially. It was between two other people. He simply inserted himself into the convo and proceeded to insult the woman.
Dot Rodger Collins I specifically said, that it is taxpayer burden to pay for the secret service and all the other expenses that go along with him being president. All I said was that the Obamas pay for their own lodging (at least on some of their trips) The Obamas paid… See More
Scott Schoemann Do what you want Storm it will prove your lack ov [sic.]conviction
Scott Schoemann Dot stop lying
Scott Schoemann they pay NOTHING
Jim Surrena <sob> Did you hear that? My feelings…lol…You’re a tool. Trolllololol…sigh.
Stormy Skys Jim I’m on my phone on my way to Newport News. When I can get on my computer and delete this I will. You know me. No political crap is worth hurting real people or losing friends. You and dot are worth more as friends than making a political point.
Jim Surrena Unass this twat Stormy, that’s my advice.
Jim Surrena All good Stormy, it’s not your fault he’s a douche.
Scott Schoemann Jim you are such a big man… youlittle cunt
Scott Schoemann hope you enjoy your audit
Jim Surrena Awww. That’s cute too. You do need to work on the spelling and such though.
Scott Schoemann spelling vs typo loser
Scott Schoemann Atleast I have a job and am not milking the satxpayers [sic.] tit
Jim Surrena Your punctuation needs a little work too.
Scott Schoemann you can read tax payers tit cant [sic.] you?
Dot Rodger Collins “… the First Family remains on Paradise Point, however, where homes cost approximately $25,000 a week. The Obamas pay this fee out of their personal funds.” (US News and World Report)
Scott Schoemann then why s [sic.] the GAO issuing payment slut?
Jim Surrena I’m sorry, my capacity for understanding stupid is at the max. I know! Why don’t you try coloring?
Scott Schoemann and that is NOT out of the US news and world report
Dot Rodger Collins “The White House has said that the Obamas paid their own way for the Spain trip, during which the first lady, along with daughter Sasha, traveled around the country and visited with the royal family. Officials told The New York Times in August 2010 tha…See More
Scott Humm I apologize if I fueled any fires, that was not my intention.
Jim Surrena I love it when they get all angry! I love that this chump has his entire day ruined.
Scott Schoemann no you didn’t Scott,
Dot Rodger Collins Did he just call me a slut? Oh wait, I must be a welfare queen, if I support Obama. Nah, I’m just one of those over-educated academic libs. I like it in my ivory tower on the beach…
Scott Schoemann keep trying fag boyo
Scott Schoemann you couldn’t ruina circkle [sic.] jerk on fag island
Jim Surrena Do you think calling me that is insulting? I’m sensing a deep level of oppression here. Is there something you’d like to tell us? It’s ok to come out, we won’t judge you.
Dot Rodger Collins *scatters food for the troll”
Scott Schoemann come on Jimmy I’m misspelling for you26 minutes ago · Like
Jim Surrena No response…his Mom must have called him to take out the trash…lol26 minutes ago · Like
Stormy Skys As for conviction Scott Schoemann my conviction for treating people properly and having a level headed debate with friends dictates that I will not tolerate them being attacked like this. There is no benefit to this pissing contest and it completely il…See More
Scott Schoemann Stormy more than once you have demonstrated your lack of conviction in your socalled [sic.] personal beliefs
Jim Surrena Oh! My turn! Jesus was black, Ronald Reagan is the devil and the government is lying about 9/11.
Scott Schoemann which is why you are such a laughing stockon [sic.] here
Jim Surrena I can’t wait for his aneurism to *pop* when Hillary Clinton gets elected in a few years.
Jim Surrena My poor hurt feelings…
Scott Schoemann Relax little boy she wont even run, shw [sic.] wont [sic.] be able to after the indictment is handed down
Jim Surrena For a guy who is bashing welfare people and the like…why are you on Facebook trying to spar with your betters on a work day?
Scott Schoemann Well it’s been surreal,
Scott Schoemann But I need to write up tat order of investigation for welfare fraud
Jim Surrena Ok, let me know how that works for you.
Scott Schoemann couldn’t be that it’s what I’m paid to do ?
Scott Schoemann It really is difficult talking down to your level
Jim Surrena Wow…these horrible insults! Oh my my my…Sir, you are indeed in desperate need of an intervention.
Scott Schoemann you must know allabout [sic.] them with your record james
Jim Surrena So let me get this right, because I screen capped it…you are a government employee on Facebook to expose fraud? Is that correct?
Scott Humm Dot, do you by chance have a link to that report? If I am wrong (and I am beginning to think I am) I would like to understand what is paid by the taxpayers and what comes out of his pocket. I was always led to believe the president and his family always vacationed on our dime.
Dot Rodger Collins @Scott Schoemann are you even a real person? Certainly, there are intelligent conservatives but you are not one of them. You are a misogynistic knuckle-dragger who is absolutely petrified of a world in which having a penis doesn’t give you an automatic…See More
Jim Surrena Sir, if you are allow me to show you where my next conversation is going:16 minutes ago · Like
Jim Surrena You have now been screen capped and recorded, including your use of slurs and obscenity on a government computer during work hours, if you have falsely represented yourself as a government employee (as is indicated by your profile) that is also a punishable offense. Or do you want to take a deep breath and step back?
Jim Surrena Also, by indicating that you have access to my personal information, you have just executed a warrantless search, which is also a felony.
Jim Surrena Oh, and the first rule of Law Enforcement (since you’re looking at my record you should see the big bold writing about that) is you never tell someone you’re undercover.
Jim Surrena Game…set…match.10 minutes ago · Like
Dot Rodger Collins @Scott Humm — here is the one for Michelle Obama’s Spain trip http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/26/michelle-obama-spain-vacation-judicial-watch_n_1457302.html and here is the one from US News and World Report. …See More
Michelle Obama’s Spain Trip Cost Taxpayers $467,000 www.huffingtonpost.comFirst lady Michelle Obama’s trip to Spain in August 2010 cost the U.S. Air Force…See more9 minutes ago · Like
Jim Surrena Oh, as for Scott Humm, we’re cool and thank you for your input. Live long and prosper.
Now, overall, what I see here is a political discussion devolved… until the threats start coming.
Jim, by all accounts, is a smartass. His girlfriend Dot keeps her composure quite well, despite being called a welfare whore.
Scott Schoemann, the redneck trash in question, hurls insults and ultimately, threats, trying to represent himself as some kind of agent of the government, and threatening “James,” who apparently doesn’t take said threats very seriously, until…
This motherfucker trolls Jim’s profile, pulls an OLD photo of Rob (yes, MY Rob, who has been friends with Jim since the early 90s) and Jim being goofy, posted it on his public profile, claiming that the two are pedophiles. I’m not even kidding! The caption under the photo reads as follows, accessible by more than 1,000 of this assnugget’s Facebook friends and any of their friends as well:
If you see either of these individuals near your home immediately contact the Police as they are wanted for child enticement By the Newport Police (this IS an internet crime issue)
Now, considering there’s no Newport where Jim lives, and that Rob doesn’t live anywhere near there either, and neither one of them has ever faced any kind of child enticement offense, never mind the fact that Rob is an innocent bystander who has been dragged into this by an unscrupulous piece of detritus, I immediately said this smelled like libel.
Make no mistake, folks. This jackass claims to be a conservative, calls a stranger on the Internet with whom he’s having a political disagreement a cunt and a slut, threatens the person with whom he disagrees, and ultimately pulls an innocent stranger into his twisted little scenario, libeling both the innocent stranger and the person with whom he’s arguing.
I sent him a nice letter at first, asking him to cease and desist, and if you know me, you also know how much composure it took to be nice and polite to this fucknozzle. But here we are several hours later, and I have gotten no reply.
I consulted with a friend of mine, who is an attorney, who confirmed my suspicions about libel.
If either of the individuals in that photo have not been accused of, and are not wanted for, child molestation, then I would consider that photo and caption to be libel and slander. These are civil actions so there are costs associated with pursuing it and if Mr. Schoemann doesn’t have deep pockets, you may win a pyrrhic victory, but given the severe stigma associated with even an accusation of child molestation in this country, I would think that’s actionable. The only defense I can think of is satire, and that doesn’t really cut it. (Despite their refusal to take it down, I don’t think one would have a creditable case against FB, so don’t go looking for deep-pockets there.) Absent legal action, you might be able to get a prominent blogger to shame Mr. Schoemann.
I doubt either Jim or Rob want to try and sue this scrotegobbler. He’s probably not even worth the time. Suing Facebook is a bit ridiculous, although Jim did request that the libelous photo be removed, and that has not happened yet.
So, here we are.
Who is Scott Schoemann?
He lives in Wisconsin, and according to WhitePages.com, his address is:
Scott A Schoemann
3871 E Morris Ave
Cudahy, WI 53110-2302
On his Facebook page, he claims to have retired from the NSA, although I really don’t know anyone in the intelligence community who would admit something like this in a public venue such as Facebook. Just sayin’
He also claims to have a PhD from MIT in forensic psychology, electronics and forensic science. I doubt that very much, as his writing ability rivals that of a dyslexic 5-th grader, but hey…. maybe MIT has washed down its standards some.
Mr. Schoemann also has a profile on the Blaze, where he tends to communicate using the same poor grammar, punctuation and syntax as he does on Facebook, with very little substance and a lot of insults.
CommentsDisplaying Scott Schoemann’s 10 most recent comments.
September 17, 2012 at 2:41am
In reply to mmmjv.
You Liberals have to tag every one so stop with the bull. the man has an earned reputation, Just like walker, so if you cant add anything constructive shove it
September 17, 2012 at 2:30am
You clowns dont get it Walker “allowed” SOME unions to continue, but blocked others, Banned the workers CHOICE to continue the way it was or change if they preferred (paying union dues) and made different rules for different groups instead of an equal playing field like he claimed. The truth is, that this was all a staged manipulation to rebuild the retirement fund that the workers HAVE been paying into all along even though he claimed otherwise, that the Teachers are NOT members of and do not get funds from, but is being rapidly depleted by the states ELECTED officials who do not pay into but after serving one full elected term receive their full pay, for life, from. THIS is the truth of the issue, not any of Walkers smoke screen. He doesnt want his Golden Goose to stop laying eggs. All he would have had to do is write legislation that would require the elected officials pay in their equal share. HOWEVER, due to decades of wage CONCESSIONS by state employees which add up to over 1500 dollars a month, the Legislation would never agree to it. These are all verifiable Facts that can be found by researching the union contracts for state employees going back into the early 1970′s, and the State legislatures compensation which is also a matter of public record as is EVERY SINGLE STATE EMPLOYESS PAY. None of this, though was ever brought up despite the efforts of the employees that were affected as it would have shown the graft on the part of the administration AND Uni
Authorities Identify Sikh Temple Shooter as Army Vet
August 7, 2012 at 12:13am
The BLAZE Fails again! The shooter was NOT a VET! He was a ex-military. The difference you ask? A Veteran has ab Honorable Discharge, anything else and you are not a Vet. Ward Michael Page was drummed out of the Army for drinking on duty on multiple occasions and numerous discipline issues, and was given a general discharge, therefore was NOT a Veteran! Lets get the facts straight!
72-Year-Old Suing City of Austin for Seizing His Home and Condemning It for Building Fallout Shelter
May 24, 2012 at 12:46am
Those of you claiming this old fart had it coming by the few released photos need a swift kick. You have no clue as to what he really did or didnt do, especially in view of the fact that the excavation that he did was greater than the photos depicted. This was just another fine example of a municipality violating the right of an individual to do as they wish woth their own property. Further the “safety issue was entirely false in that the structure would have collapsed INTO the socalled bunker, or what in the north what would be called a BASEMENT and hot outward Off of his property. This is just another example of the erosion of the rights of the individual over the NONEXISTANT rights of the body politic… When they come for yoy we will just sit back and laugh and remind you that we told you so as we cling to our guns and bibles.
The rambling, illiterate lunacy goes on and on, so you get the idea.
He’s rude, illiterate and should suit be brought against him, would likely be found guilty of libel. Since, Mr. Schoemann decided to pull someone’s photo that included an innocent person who had nothing to do with the argument, and proceeded to accuse them both of “child enticement,” I suppose it would only make sense (using Mr. Schoemann’s logic) to assume that he is into bestiality and has violated at least one horse, based on this photo and its caption. Sad for the innocent horse, really. Especially since the horse’s reputation will be sullied by being associated forever on the Internet with the words “bestiality” and “Scott Schoemann.”
But I’m sure Mr. Schoemann wouldn’t want someone to do that to him, now would he?
But as a self-professed conservative, he understands that actions have consequences.
Too bad his egregious behavior will be used to paint all conservatives with a broad brush. Sad, really.
UPDATE: When I said this tool had no balls in the title, I meant it. And he’s proving it again and again. Instead of taking responsibility for his actions, apologizing and taking the offending photo down, he waited until this blog post was sent to enough of his family members to take it down and block me. It would have been easy to simply reply, “Hey, I lost my temper in that argument. I’ve taken down the photo. I apologize.” Not that it makes posting a photo of a complete stranger on a public site and accusing him of being a child molester as retaliation for a stupid political flame war any less repugnant, but it would have shown some moral character and intestinal fortitude.
Scotty boy is apparently not one of those people.
His latest post to his drooling followers claims that not only is the above conversation in which he calls Jim and Dot all kinds of names, threatens Jim and claims to be a government agent (HOW I WISH THERE WAS A STOLEN VALOR PAGE FOR THOSE WHO FALSELY CLAIM TO BE SPIES, GOVERNMENT AGENTS, ETC.!) “imaginary,” but somehow the photo on his wall, accusing Jim and Rob of “child enticement” got there by itself – he knew nothing about it, apparently.
Anyone Know this Jim Surrena character? he is harassing my daughter, his purported friend Nicki Fellenzer has posted an imagined discussion on her blog, and I found a pic of this horses ass on my page. (emphasis mine)
George Ronald Anderson Jr. Never heard of him before
35 minutes ago
MW CA Ville he isn’t on my friends list…
35 minutes ago
Rosalitta A. Baker Wow some ppl have no respect…that guy don’t know who he’s messing with
29 minutes ago via mobile
Roy Bailey Block them and report Scott…………….
19 minutes ago
Bill Conrad BOOM
9 minutes ago
Yeah, that guy don’t know who he’s messing with… HOLY BAD GRAMMAR, BATMAN!
So, he FOUND an old profile photo of Rob and Jim, and he had NOTHING to do with posting it and telling people to watch out for these two, because they’re wanted by the police for child enticement. Nothing at all. He didn’t ignore a polite request to remove the photo, and only did so when the link to this blog was apparently sent to members of his family in an attempt to get him to remove it.
I see no attempt to take responsibility for his actions.
I see a coward – someone with no testicular fortitude – who apparently lost his temper, did something libelous and evil after getting into an argument with someone on Facebook, realized what he did, and then tried to cover it up and feign ignorance.
Again, I have to wonder if this Scott Schoemann is a real conservative. A real conservative would at least have the integrity to admit he’s wrong. Apparently Scott Schoemann has none of this.