This Week’s Gun Grabbing Stupidity – Gone Full Retard

I know you’re used to politicians saying stupid things – after all, they’re really the lowest common denominator of human life. Remember Jerrold Nadler saying loudly and proudly that President Obama ought to EXPLOIT the Newtown tragedy to push his gun control agenda? Remember noted Constitutional scholar Nancy Pelosi claiming you have the First Amendment right to own guns? Remember the various antics of the Congressional Black Caucus after the Trayvon Martin shooting?

However, this past week was a marathon of moronery, a bonanza of boneheadedness, a circus of senselessness the likes of which I have rarely seen.

1 – We’ll start with dumbass extraordinaire Colorado Democrat Rep. Joe Salazar, who told women this weekend that they were much too hysterical and emotional to protect themselves with guns. No, really. Because see… they have no way of knowing whether the person they think is following them is actually following them and is going to rape them, or whether it’s someone innocent. And besides, they don’t need guns. That’s why we have rape whistles…

Not. Even. Kidding.

And the leftards accuse the GOP of waging a war against women  for refusing to pay for Sandra Fluke’s condoms? Seriously?

2 – Dumbass extraordinaire zee second is Police Chief Ken James from Emeryville, California (where else?), who had the temerity to claim that a) guns are not defensive weapons, b) police use them as offensive weapons to intimidate and show power and c) police officers don’t carry weapons to defend themselves, but rather to do their job in a “safe and effective manner.”

Not. Even. Kidding.

Nice little tyrant! I guess that whole “protect and serve” thing eludes the chief. And apparently, that whole not drawing their firearms unless threatened thing doesn’t exist in Chief James’ twisted world. And I guess he hasn’t heard of the nearly daily use of firearms to DEFEND LIVES that occurs here in the United States. No. HIS cops only use guns to intimidate. Rather telling, isn’t it?

3 – Then we had the OOOPS! moment from Washington State, where the gun-grabbing neanderthals in the legislature made their intent to confiscate weapons by going door-to-door perfectly clear… perfectly by accident, giving even the leftiest liberal a weak tummy.

“They always say, we’ll never go house to house to take your guns away. But then you see this, and you have to wonder.”

That’s no gun-rights absolutist talking, but Lance Palmer, a Seattle trial lawyer and self-described liberal who brought the troubling Senate Bill 5737 to my attention. It’s the long-awaited assault-weapons ban, introduced last week by three Seattle Democrats.

Responding to the Newtown school massacre, the bill would ban the sale of semi-automatic weapons that use detachable ammunition magazines. Clips that contain more than 10 rounds would be illegal.

But then, with respect to the thousands of weapons like that already owned by Washington residents, the bill says this:

“In order to continue to possess an assault weapon that was legally possessed on the effective date of this section, the person possessing shall … safely and securely store the assault weapon. The sheriff of the county may, no more than once per year, conduct an inspection to ensure compliance with this subsection.”

Not. Even. Kidding.

And they claim it’s a mistake. One leftard, Sen. Adam Kline said he did not know the bill authorized these police searches because he had not read it closely before signing on (Well, Nancy Pelosi says you need to pass the bill to know what’s in it, right?).  This almost deserves a bullet of its own in this gallery of retardery, but since it’s related, I’ll leave it be.

The other shitbag who sponsored this bill claims the provision about door-to-door searches should have never been in there, but he left it in as… oh… something we should strive toward – “a general statement, as a guiding light of where we need to go.”

Really? So, while it’s unconstitutional now, it’s really where we need to be. Got it. Admission of authoritarian swinery noted.

4 – Next up is Colorado’s John Hickenlooper, who believes not just in expanded background checks, but also in forcing the buyer to pay for them, making guns even more prohibitively expensive for poor folks, who may not be living in the safest of neighborhoods and are more likely to need tools of self defense. Why do you hate poor people, Hickeylicker?

I’m lumping another Colorado Dumbshit Dickey Lee Hullinghorst in with Horkenlicker (and not just because they have similarly stupid last names), but because this asshat saw it fit to say the following, “I resent the implication that unless we all arm ourselves we will not be adequately protected.” The thousands of people who use guns every year to protect themselves and their loved ones beg to differ, Dickey.

5 – Then we have the tool I have already mentioned this weekend, but who is worth mentioning again, because of the sheer absurdity of his statements that imply gun rights supporters are corrupt and endanger the public safety, because they support gun rights – all while he collects an exorbitant salary, ostensibly to ensure the safety and security of Chicago’s citizens, but who is a miserable fail at his job. Gerry McCarthy – Chicago Police Superintendent. By that logic, every drooling retard who gave campaign money to his boss Rahm Emanuel and nationally to Barack Obama’s campaign can be labeled corrupt and a danger not just to public safety, because of their support for efforts to disarm innocent citizens and leave them at the mercy of armed thugs Gerry can’t seem to get his police to control, but also because of a wider agenda of economic failure that leads to more crime and despair.

6 – David Frum offers us this “Plan B” on guns, which he says the President should adopt in order to quell gun violence: the Surgeon General should help demonstrate through a study (which I’m sure will not add a single dime to the deficit) that guns are bad for the owner’s health. And frankly, guns should have doohickeys on them that tell the stupid that there’s a bullet thingy inside.

Not. Even. Kidding.

My kids have known the rules of gun safety since they were toddlers, and the first thing they do when they pick up a gun is check to see if there’s a round in the chamber. Apparently, my kids are much smarter than David Frum.

Enjoy. This is the enemy… or enema… you face. If we can’t defeat these losers, the Republic is lost.

38 responses

  1. I do like how a Beretta lets you know, even in the dark, if there’s one in the pipe.

    But I always keep one in the pipe, so it’s really just a cool feature and not terribly utile. Of course it’s loaded; if I wanted a mere bludgeon I’d use a giant axe handled mace with a bunch of rusty nails sticking out of it at one end and perhaps a couple of straight razors on the other end to mix it up a bit.🙂

    Like

  2. Thanks for rounding up all the gun grabbing swine in one pen. Since the one jack wad believes that women would only hurt themselves with a gun, maybe he should go to a real range, and see all the women who shoot spot on with 1911’s and 357’s. It might sway his opinion a bit.

    Like

    1. +1 Hard to make a choice amongst as to who gets the prize for asshattery today (I was keeping a weekly tally but got overwhelmed with choices). Today it is a toss up between Gerry “Lead by Personal Example” McCarthy or Joe “GQ” Salazar (who dresses that boy?). I’ll have to go with McCarthy as he has distinguished himself as a true arrogant, blow hard based on his recent statements and by his personal conduct over several years while serving as CofP for Chicago. Salazar comes in at 2nd as a result of his cluelessness permitting his mouth to overload his bulbous rear end.

      Like

  3. If you want to be taken seriously by a wider audience, you need to drop the use of the word RETARD. I find it offensive & am I’m sure others do as well. You have good points here, you do not need such adjectives.

    Like

    1. Would you believe that I don’t give a rat’s ass about what you or anyone else finds OFFENSIVE? Especially when pronounced with such a sense of entitlement?

      If my points are salient, then I don’t worry about offending.

      Like

    2. e-teg: I prefer the word “fucktard”. How’s that? Or do you get offended by the vaguely implied slur against someone’s arrested sexual development too?

      Seriously, any verbal put-down label implies that some condition is not to be aspired to. Get over it.

      Like

  4. As for #3…it gets worse. The argument that Congresscritter Kline and the prime sponsor, Ed Murray, didn’t know that the home search provision was in the bill doesn’t hold water. Why? Because Kline also sponsored the same provision in 2005 and 2010. So, either, he hasn’t read the bill’s wording in 8 years…or he’s lying. And since the guy froths at the mouth over new gun control laws…I think it’s the latter.

    Like

  5. Nicki – You have confused constructive feedback for a liberals entitlement view. I tried to help, but you obviously have all the answers being the only well armed veteran capable of writing a blog about freedoms. I’m glad your two munchkins (as you call them) do not have any mental handicaps to deal with in life.

    Like

    1. I have confused nothing. Your comment – from someone who is obviously new to this blog – reeks of entitlement, obviously feeling like you’re entitled to my consideration in return for “being taken seriously.” Superior AND entitled.

      Second, you haven’t the slightest idea what my munchkins have dealt with and what they have overcome. So don’t make assumptions.

      And finally, I would submit people with true mental handicaps are still much more rational and logical and much less offensive than the people I’m describing in this blog.

      Like

  6. Thank You etegrity.

    Like

  7. You have lost readers over this one word in the title whether you want to see the reality or not. Assumptions? You made a large one with your first reply about who I am. I do not need anything from you, consideration or otherwise. Good luck with your blog.

    Like

    1. Afraid not, I have forwarded to everyone I know. Nicky is 100% spot on.

      Like

    2. Lose one, gain three. I’m new and I’m not offended. This was linked was posted on a firearms forum and I bet there are a dozen new readers. It’s about time we dropped the PC BS. Just like the recent USDA cultural sensitivity training where our government employees had to bang the table and repeat “Pilgrims were illegal aliens” and replace the word “minority” with “emerging majorities”. If you’re a retard from libtardia, just admit it and get over it. You will feel much better without having to worry about spinning each word and statement. You no longer get a participation trophy so your feelings aren’t hurt. The sooner you get a little thick skin and face reality without veils and deflections, the sooner you can become a true contributing member of society. A Maker instead of a Taker. We have a phrase for this type of honesty, it’s called “growing up”. We don’t need anymore 50 year old boys and girls running the country.

      Like

      1. Wow, folks! I appreciate the feedback. I didn’t really realize how many new readers we’re gaining here. Thank you for coming over!

        Like

  8. Read the book “What Makes You Think We Read The Bills?” by Sen. H.L. Richardson (ret.) They rarely read the bills, they pay someone to create footnotes for them. Even if they disagree with a bill they’ll vote yes on it if the author of the bill voted for one of their bills in the past. What’s scary is these douche bags got voted for by liked minded people, there’s not a rational thought between them, and about all their qualified to do is ask “would you like fries with that”!

    Like

  9. What’s really scary about these fine examples of left wing nuttery; these are only the ones that are getting publicity. How many more idiots are sitting in city councils, statehouses, hell – school boards? And making the same type of stupid, stupid, statements and we the people just aren’t hearing about them. We live in very perilous times, indeed.
    And eteg – we aren’t very PC around most of these gun blogs, so we tend to say what we mean, and mean what we say.

    Like

  10. Nicki,

    Please feel free to offend away. I enjoy your hard edge writing style, and if you gave it up, I might not read your blog anymore. (I wonder if I said that with enough ‘entitlement’) 😉

    Like

    1. ROFLMAO! Nicely played, Sir!

      Like

  11. I think you may have missed the ‘genius’ who told women at a Colorado college that they should vomit and urinate on themselves to stop a rapist.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2281317/Colorado-college-sparks-controversy-advising-women-vomit-urinate-bid-stop-rapist-state-lawmakers-pass-banning-concealed-guns-campuses.html

    Like

    1. OMG so much stoopid – so little time!

      Like

  12. Gun Shy doesn’t want to appear as a shameless link whore, but the link below may be a more practical commentary on self defense, than the statements made by the gaggle of numb nuts that you so eloquently exposed for the douche nozzles that they are:

    http://aroundotown.blogspot.com/2008/11/tips-for-surviving-in-dangerous-urban.html

    Like

    1. Whore away, dude! Gut schtuff!

      Like

  13. Nicki,

    After giving this some thought, I have a way to test their ‘just urinate’ theory to make sure it will work. The utterly thoughtless man/men who came up with this uncaring masochistic idea to further denigrate women should volunteer to try and urinate while someone is inserting a somewhat large item into his ‘back door’. If he can pee, then….

    Now we must wait for the show of hands from the volunteer(s). :-O

    Like

    1. Ummm
      Ewwwww!

      Have you SEEN these people??? My dinner is coming up.

      Like

    2. As a proud member of the Pink Pistols, I’m willing to take one for the team, but … NO. I mean to say, HECK NO! I think I

      Like

      1. Can’t blame ya!

        Like

  14. You are right. They might all rush to try it. Never mind.

    Like

  15. Damn fine article, sir. Keep preaching the truth!!!

    Like

  16. Nicki

    Add one more new reader. Offend away

    Like

    1. I’ll do my best. LOL!

      Thanks!

      Like

  17. New here myself—sent over by a member of the Annoyed Army. I think I’ll be a regular from now on, too. Pay no attention to those retards who think using the word somehow “insults” them or their kids, of course. Kids who are retarded couldn’t care less and their parents who find the word insulting forget that you can’t be “insulted” on someone else’s behalf.

    Like

    1. Welcome! And frankly, as I stated earlier, mentally challenged kids likely are more useful and logical than the politicians to whom we refer here. LOL!

      Getting butthurt over a word simply detracts from the actual issue at hand and its discussion, and I refuse to bow down to the perpetually offended.
      🙂

      Like

  18. Keep the focus! I find what these politicians are saying trying to eliminate our natural/God given rights, as affirmed by the Second Amendment to be the most offensive thing in life for now.

    Like

  19. Got here from a link at Bad Blue. Great article. First time visitor. As Dr. Ben Carson so eloquently said the other day at the National Prayer Breakfast, we need to get rid of the PC crap.

    Added to my blog roll

    Like

    1. Good to have ya here!

      Like

  20. […] a few days ago, drooling imbecile Joe Salazar claimed women shouldn’t have firearms on campus because they might get hysterical,…. They might shoot an innocent! What do you think will happen when that same […]

    Like

  21. the twobig enemies of firearms

    RUST and POLITICANS

    Like

%d bloggers like this: