Guilty before proven innocent

In case you gun owners didn’t know this, Dianne Feinstein thinks you’re all potential criminals and crazies who at any point can snap and use your firearms to kill scores of innocent children. Ergo, she believes you need to be registered, fingerprinted, taxed and tracked merely for exercising your Second Amendment right.

No, I’m not kidding.

The “assault” weapons ban Feinswine plans on introducing as a “serious” measure to prevent massacres such as the one at Sandy Hook Elementary School includes nearly every firearm and aims to ensure that gun owners in this nation are tracked by their own government – not for committing any type of crime, but for merely owning what they’re constitutionally entitled to own.

Think I’m being paranoid?

  • Bans the sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of:
    • 120 specifically-named firearms;
    • Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one or more military characteristics; and
    • Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.
  • Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by:
    • Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test;
    • Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressors from the characteristics test; and
    • Banning firearms with “thumbhole stocks” and “bullet buttons” to address attempts to “work around” prior bans.
  • Bans large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than 10 rounds.
  • Protects legitimate hunters and the rights of existing gun owners by:
    • Grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment;
    • Exempting over 900 specifically-named weapons used for hunting or sporting purposes; and
    • Exempting antique, manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons.
  • Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include:
    • Background check of owner and any transferee;
    • Type and serial number of the firearm;
    • Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint;
    • Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or local law; and
    • Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration.

So, she’ll ban most firearms – mostly for cosmetic reasons – and those she would allow you to keep… well, you’ll have to submit to a complete booking process, including photo and fingerprint.

In other words… let’s say you’re the proud owner of a scary, black rifle gifted to you by your grandpappy – a rifle you have never used to commit any kind of crime. Well, if Feinswine has her way, you will be branded a potential criminal merely for owning the object.

Presumption of innocence? PLEASE! Where do you think you are, America?

Let’s not mention the fact that the scary-looking guns she wants to ban are simply semi-automatics that fire a single round with one pull of the trigger – no matter what size the magazine.

Let’s not mention the fact that someone intent on killing people simply has to pre- load 5-6 “legal” 10-round mags before going on their spree, drop the empty mag, and slap in the next one and keep shooting. That takes all of a couple of seconds, making the ban on high-capacity magazines absolutely worthless.

And let’s not mention the fact that “shall not be infringed” means just that.

I know folks who are convinced this proposed ban will go nowhere – that because the majority of Americans oppose it, it will not pass.  I will just remind you that this is not the first time politicians have rammed legislation down the throats of unwilling Americans.

I will also remind you that there will always be idiot sheep who will abide by such unreasonable mandates and will turn themselves into subjects instead of citizens.

And government officials, aided by a compliant media are more than willing to foment panic. Witness the grim looking police officer standing next to an AT-4 tube, looking like the damn thing could explode any moment.

I just gave some nimrod $200 for this dangerous... tube thingy.

I just gave some nimrod $200 for this dangerous… tube thingy

Meanwhile, the author of the article, one Dennis Romero, breathlessly hyperventilates about this weapon of “terror.”

Holy hell why do people on our streets have military grade rocket launchers?


They propel rocket grenades, but the official called them “non-working” because they did not have the “projectiles” with them. Thank God!?

Asked if they could arouse terror concerns among FBI and Homeland Security officials, the lawman told us that the LAPD had received no inquiries and that the department would, in any case, honor its no-questions-asked commitment to keep the donors anonymous.

Oh noez! A LAW weapon! For tankz and stuff!

Relax, Dennis. Go change your diaper. No one “on the streets” has anything of the sort.

Anyone who’s ever spent any time in the military and has fired one of these things knows that it’s one shot. Fire, and it’s done. The thing is now a paperweight, and Los Angeles just handed over $200 to some guy for a plastic tube.





9 responses

  1. I think since they are factually, though unlawfully & UN-Constitutionally, treating gunowners as if we’re a wholly separate race or group, any ‘laws’ specifically targeting us would fall under the ‘Bill of Attainder-clause’ in Article I, Section 9; Clause 3 of the Constitution for the United States of America, which explicitly states:

    No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed

    The immediate aftermath of Sandy Hook massacre and weeks following it, should factually prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that the anti-2A Media, politicians, PAC’s, and NGO’s are blatantly persecuting innocent gun owners who had ZERO involvement with the tragedy, whatsoever.

    Because they’ve factually gone after all gunowners, whose ‘trait’ they simply qualified and quantified as ‘anyone who merely owns a gun,’ any legislation targeting ‘us’ would now fall under the Bill of Attainder violation.

    Welcome to the new Black, the new Jew, the new Muslim, the new Gay.

    Ha ha, one would think that liberals/RINOs would be happy now that we can use the race & gay victim card. LOL. But I digress.

    The rabid gun CONFISCATORS (which by now, it should be clear beyond a shadow of a doubt to anyone with a pulse what the anti’s have always wanted but hidden under the canard of “reasonable regulation”) and their usual 2A regulatory run-around via Executive Orders and ATF ‘rules’ (which are NOT lawful Constitutional laws at all, as the Legislative branch had no part what so ever in writing those not-‘laws’) have always been challenged/fallen under the purview of the 2nd Amendment violations.

    And while not exhausting empty air, for the umteenth time, on the original 18th century definition of the term “well regulated” which simply meant ‘well maintained,’ ‘skills kept up to date,’ ‘be ready,’ ‘well calibrated’ as in “well regulated weights and measures,” to a purported delusional cult of the self-professed ‘self-enlightened liberals’ whose idea of a preventative solution against an armed neurological bag of filth, is to stand in front of his/her oncoming powder propelled projectile and read off a piece of paper with their unicorn wishlist of things that shouldn’t exist in the world…but still does, and always will, surely maybe all too moot at this juncture in history.

    But, suppose with their current Bill of Rights destruction rollerball, in addition to the direct rebuttals based on 2nd Amendment, those among the armed intelligentsia will be well suited to also consider additional lawful remedies: 10th Amendment nullification, Bill of Attainder, and the “Ronnie Barret Option.”

    Don’t know if you’ll be attending the upcoming SHOT show in Las Vegas in Jan., 2013, but it would be great if the masses of armed Americans pose this question to all guns/ammo/component/accessories/training companies: Years ago when CEO and founder of Barrett Rifles, one Ronnie Barrett, saw that the LAPD & Cali political hacks were using HIS Barrett M82 as a prop to push for a permanent .50cal ban, he directly wrote a letter to LAPD Commish Bratton, who then replied Ronnie with the usual political hackery. To which Ronnie responded with complete ban on sale/service/resupplying of ANY Californian govt agency!

    So since, FeinSTINk on no uncertain terms made clear on her intent to utterly eradicate the 2nd Amd. not merely ‘as we know it,’ but wholesale repeal it, PERIOD, which those of us paying attention have always known it’s been a Fabian socialist slow totalitarian tip-toe the liberal/RINO gungrabbers have been playing, what is our line in the sand, what’s left for us to ‘negotiate?’

    I’d say not only no more compromise!

    On top of that, I’d say throw MORE into the public gun ‘debate’ discourse: a COMPLETE REPEAL of NFA, GCA, FOPA, and BradyBill (NICS, etc).

    If they think they can ‘negotiate’ against our pre-Constitution, immutable natural right of self-defense with some tyrannical govt legalese, they’re delusional. No govt can erase our innate immutable Natural Rights, including the natural right of self-defense, let alone with mere words, no more than they ‘can’ erase the Sun from the Cosmos, just because they legislate that they can.

    What’s more, even if we don’t get those almost century’s worth of 2A “infringements” repealed, merely putting those issues on top of their current yappery, forces them to deal with it, and perception-wise, forces them to expend energy countering it, since we’ve just ‘put that on the table’ for discussion, if they indeed delude this is an actual ‘debate’ or ‘negotiation’ as if our side any more to give.

    NO MORE!

    Pardon the lengthy verbiage oh dear Proprietor Nicki.

    But looked like your comment section, and thought it could use some alphabet painting, and you’ve always seemed particularly sharp in your lyrical diction.

    Not sure if you will indeed be attending the upcoming SHOT show in Jan. 2012, but if so, please spread the word.

    Thanks for your patience.


  2. I am a legal gun owner who submitted to background checks, completed the appropriate training, and take gun ownership seriously. As law-abiding citizens we are expected to navigate the labyrinth of conflicting state laws regarding firearms and we do successfully everyday. Although many of these laws are conflicting between neighboring states, we still respect them and abide by them everyday. Let’s make it easy for everyone (including David Gregory) and develop a basic framework across the United States.

    With 300 million firearms in private hands (one-third of them pistols), the overwhelming majority of gun owners ARE responsible, law-abiding citizens, which is why these horrific massacres are not commonplace, but rather horrific outliers that can never be legislated away (e.g. DC, Chicago, and “Gun Free Zones”). We need teach personal responsibility to our children, family, friends, neighbors and politicians and hold them accountable for their actions.

    For several examples for the recent use of firearms for defensive purposes not typically reported by the national media please visit: and forward this address to others to whom this information may be useful. @forceequalizer


  3. If you remember that interview w / Wayne LaPierre this past Sun. on M.T.P. , didn’t David Gregory break the law by having in his possession a 30 round clip ? If that interview was conducted in either D.C. or N.Y.C. , he broke the law being that those devises are outlawed in those wonderful places . Where are the calls for his arrest ? If Wayne was on his game he would have called him out on that point . His reaction would have been priceless to witness .


    1. Yes, he did break the DC law, and yes, he is getting investigated.


  4. What if all legal gun owners told the feds to pixx up a rope and ignored them? Hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of citizens would become felons over night. What would happen then?? Would They pick us off one at a time through records? They can go back forever and find out who bought a gun in a store in 1965. All it takes is a phone call to the right party. Maybe we better start practicing with a bow and arrows…anything…..Or we can start….no better not write that thought…one never knows Who is watching….


  5. Is there any updates to David Gregory’s ILLEGAL POSSESSION of that 30 round magazine ? Or is the L.S.M. going to let that one be swept under the rug !!!


    1. If there are any updates, I will post them.


  6. I am not going to comply with ANY new gun laws. I’ve bent over backwards to abide intrusions into my rights.

    No more.

    Senator Feinstain can suck my cock.


%d bloggers like this: