This is proof positive that science has been corrupted by power-hungry, fraud-loving politicians. This is no joke. The University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit (CRU) files have been hacked, and the director of the CRU Phil Jones has acknowledged that the files belong to them. They are proof positive that global warming research is fraudulent and has been corrupted by political motives.
Jones claims the files were obtained illegally as if that absolves
the content. It doesn’t and it is enough to destroy all their careers.
Jones gave a foretaste of his behavior in 2005. Warwick Hughes asked
for the data and method he used for his claim of a 0.6°C temperature
rise since the end of the nineteenth century. Jones responded, “We
have 25 years or so invested in the work. Why should I make the data
available to you when your aim is to try and find something wrong with
it?” He has stonewalled ever since. The main reason was because it
was used as a key argument in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) Reports to convince the world humans caused rapid warming
in the 20th century. The emails obtained are a frightening record of arrogance, and deception far beyond his 2005 effort.
Another glimpse into what the files and emails reveal was the report by Professor Deming. He wrote, “
With publication of an article in Science (in 1995) I gained sufficient
credibility in the community of scientists working on climate change.
They thought I was one of them someone who would pervert science in the
service of social and political causes. So one of them let his guard
down. A major person working in the area of climate change and global
warming sent me an astonishing email that said. “We must get rid of the
Medieval Warm Period.” The person in question was Jonathan
Overpeck and his even more revealing emails are part of those exposed
by the hacker. It is now very clear that Deming’s charge was precise.
They have perverted science in the service of social and political
Professor Wegman showed how this “community of scientists” published
together and peer reviewed each other’s work. I was always suspicious
about why peer review was such a big deal. Now all my suspicions are
confirmed. The emails reveal how they controlled the process, including
manipulating some of the major journals like Science and Nature. We know the editor of the Journal of Climate, Andrew Weaver, was one of the “community”. They organized
lists of reviewers when required making sure they gave the editor only
favorable names. They threatened to isolate and marginalize one editor
who they believed was recalcitrant.
These people controlled the global weather data used by the IPCC
through the joint Hadley and CRU and produced the HadCRUT data. They
controlled the IPCC, especially crucial chapters and especially
preparation of the Summary for PolicyMakers (SPM). Stephen Schneider
was a prime mover there from the earliest reports to the most
influential in 2001. They also had a left wing conduit to the New York
Times. The emails between Andy Revkin and the community are very
revealing and must place his journalistic integrity in serious
jeopardy. Of course the IPCC Reports and especially the SPM Reports are
the basis for Kyoto and the Copenhagen Accord, but now we know they are
based on completely falsified and manipulated data and science. It is
no longer a suspicion. Surely this is the death knell for the CRU, the
IPCC, Kyoto and Copenhagen and the Carbon Credits shell game.
All the files are here:
And I believe this is proof positive that this vast fraud that was perpetrated on the entire population of the world served to do two things: redistribute income and give politicians more authority over the lives of their citizens.
The scum in Congress passed the insane Cap and Trade bill. Why? For a purpose that was false and misleading, but one that, if passed, served to give them power and cost us a fortune.
The Washington Post covered the story here, but it doesn’t even begin to touch the vast fraud that was perpetrated on the world! And the title:
In the trenches on climate change, hostility among foes
Stolen e-mails reveal venomous feelings toward skeptics
This is not just about hostility. This is about the biggest lie to perpetuate political means I’ve ever run across!
As of this writing, I have found only 321 stories on Google News when I type in the keywords “global warming” and “fraud.” I’d like to see more media outlets pick this up. Will they?
Eric Holder – the terrorist coddling, terrorist pardoning, race baiting, criminal pardoning (as long as they’re Obama supporters), Second Amendment hating Obama Administration Attorney General has testified in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee that his Justice Department has apparently been doing a stellar job protecting the American public from terrorism.
Protecting America against acts of terrorism is the highest priority of
the Department. The Department is constantly striving to improve its
ability to identify, penetrate, and dismantle terrorist plots as a
result of a series of structural reforms, the development of new
intelligence and law enforcement tools, and a new mindset that values
information sharing, communication and prevention.
Apparently, the Hasan case is a tremendous failure. What tools were needed to take a look at Hasan’s business cards, for instance? Why is comminicating with al Qaida not considered suspicious enough for an Army officer to be put under a microscope?
This wasn’t clue enough? The motherfucker gave out business cards that identified his twisted ass as a “SoA” (Soldier / Servant of Allah), he was in contact with terrorists, and actually gave a Powerpoint presentation explaining the “Koranic World View” and nothing was done about it. We need more tools? Is that code for “we need more taxpayer funding for worthless programs that we claim will help us track terrorists, but will, in fact, serve to mollify terrorist-loving organizations such as CAIR as we do our very best to never, ever profile Muslims?”
I am committed to continuing to build our capacity to deter, detect and
disrupt terrorist plots and to identify those who would seek to do us
harm; and I am committed to doing so consistent with the rule of law
and American values. We will continue to develop intelligence, identify
new and emerging threats, and use the full range of tools and
capabilities the Department possesses in its intelligence and law
We had the tools already. We had SCREAMING warning signs that Hasan was a terrorist piece of festering shit. Neither you, nor your DOJ, nor your “tools” did anything to stop this shitbag. But NOW, you promise to do something about it? What is it that you’re going to do, Mr. Holder?
“There are restrictions on even
notification, so for instance the people in one end of the justice
system, the Joint Terrorism Task force, were not notified when Major
Hasan bought a gun. That’s not talking about whether the law should
allow it or not, but clearly there should be notification. Now the
Tiahrt amendment, the 24 background check requirement gets in the way
of that. My question is: Will the Justice Department remove the
Tiahrt 24 hour background check destruction requirement from its 2011
budget to allow the FBI to keep records of guns purchased by subjects
of terrorist inquiries? I am just limiting it to that issue, like Major
“The position of the Administration is
that there should be a basis for law enforcement to share information
about gun purchases. Fully respect the Second Amendment, fully respect
the Heller decision. It does not seem to us that this is inconsistent
to allow law enforcement agencies to share that kind of information,
for that information to be retained and then to be shared by law
“I would encourage you to write that into the budget that you are going to bring to us.”
“I believe it is. But I will have to check.”
The Law Enforcement Alliance of America first made this revelation a couple of days ago. This was not surprising. Hasan never had a criminal record. His gun purchase was apparently perfectly legitimate. He was an Army officer. How, exactly, would have “information sharing” about Hasan having purchased a gun set of any alarm bells, when his business card, his public outpouring of affection for suicide bombers, his attempts at communication with al Qaida and his radical islamist views did not? What, exactly, would have the repeal of the Tiahrt Amendment done?
How would establishing a de facto registration of those who legally purchase firearms in America have helped stop Hasan?
Given the administration more “tools?”
I think we have enough tools in this administration already, thanks.
The government watchdog overseeing economic stimulus spending says the White House was too quick to take credit for saving or creating 640,000 jobs.
The White House trumpeted job figures released last month, saying they
proved the administration is on track to save or create 3.5 million
jobs by the end of next year.
But Earl Devaney,
whose agency collected and released the data, said Thursday there are
too many errors to know how many jobs have been created. Under
questioning on Capitol Hill, he agreed the White House should have acknowledged the doubt surrounding the numbers.
What does it take to get a wavering senator to vote for health care reform?
Here’s a case study.
On page 432 of the Reid bill, there is a section increasing federal
Medicaid subsidies for “certain states recovering from a major
The section spends two pages defining which “states” would qualify,
saying, among other things, that it would be states that “during the
preceding 7 fiscal years” have been declared a “major disaster area.”
I am told the section applies to exactly one state: Louisiana, the
home of moderate Democrat Mary Landrieu, who has been playing hard to
get on the health care bill.
In other words, the bill spends two pages describing would could be
written with a single world: Louisiana. (This may also help explain
why the bill is long.)
Senator Harry Reid, who drafted the bill, cannot pass it without the support of Louisiana’s Mary Landrieu.
How much does it cost? According to the Congressional Budget Office: $100 million.
Where Reid and scumbag Democrats come from, this is just business as usual.
What’s called business as usual?
Forcing through a more than 2000 page bill that includes a bribe for a Senator without whom it can’t pass, imposes a 5 percent tax on those who make a choice to have cosmetic surgery (because obviously, anything that allows folks the freedom to make a choice must be taxed) and imposes rules and regulations on the insurance industry that will eventually drive it out of business, eventually forcing those who can no longer get private insurance into a government controlled clusterfuck scheme.
And by the way, if you’re African American and you don’t support a corrupt government health care scheme, then you’re obviously not really black. So says race-baiting assclown Jesse Jackson. Take THAT, black conservatives! You can’t be black unless you’re a Marxist shitbag!
If you’re a scumbag burglar, what would be more humiliating – being thwarted by a 91 year old brandishing a weapon, or being thwarted by a naked 91 year old brandishing a weapon?
He got more than he bargained for when he decided to mess with this
elderly man and his trusty rottweiler mix. Robert Thompson, 91, and his
5-year-old dog, Rett, tag-teamed a thug trying to break into their Lake
Worth home Friday night.
“I think the guy was scared to death,” Thompson said. “He was screaming.”
Thompson jumped out of bed, totally naked, and went to go check things out with Rett by his side.
“I started to let him out the door, and he was so anxious he got caught in the door,” he said.
According to the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office, 26-year-old
Jose Pascual was the man on the porch. Rett pinned Pascual, but this
Purple Heart World War II veteran wanted back-up.
“I went in and got my cell phone and dialed 911 and got my gun,” he said.
Hmmmm…. on a side note, any bets on the immigration status of Jose Pascual?